Interesting story today in the Rocky Mountain News about former Congressman Scott McInnis and his apparent desire to run for governor. It's interesting that he is stepping so carefully while at the same time clearly indicating his preference.
Perhaps McInnis still doesn't know how he's going to deal with the fiasco regarding his congressional campaign funds. For those of you unfamiliar with the story, read this article from the Washington Post.
McInnis also indicated his thoughts that Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper will be the Democratic candidate in the governor's race. In addition, the RMN story gives the first comment by Hick or his staff regarding the race that we have seen in a long time:
However, Hickenlooper "finds it hard to imagine any job he would love more than being mayor of Denver," said spokeswoman Lindy Eichenbaum Lent.
You certainly can't take much out of that comment other than to note the fact that the door is left wide open for a run. "Well, he does love Denver, but..."
I would be seriously shocked if Hickenlooper ran for governor. I think the statement that he loves his job is a very clear, "No I will not be running."
Posted by: Strider | March 22, 2005 at 11:11 AM
Strider:
The quote from Hick's press person is a variation on the line he has consistently used, when asked about Governor. However, it is a long way from "No I will not be running."
Indeed, he may not run, but if you have absolutely no intention of running, then you say so, unequivocally. You say: "No I will not be running."
I continue to believe that in the end he will run, and by leaving the door open, as he is, that speculation will continue to be fueled.
Posted by: Roger | March 22, 2005 at 11:50 AM
As with past quotes from Hickenlooper and his staff on the Governor's race, this one has left an opening large enough for Ben Nighthorse Campbell to drive his semi through.
Posted by: Alfalfa | March 22, 2005 at 12:44 PM
When someone doesn't want to run for a particular office they may still want to get as much mileage out of being considered for it as they can.
Case in point: Everyone knew that DeGette wouldn't be running for the U.S. Senate last year, but she was still very put-out that people weren't talking about her and considering her as a potential candidate. Not because she wanted people to recruit her to run, but because she becomes more important if people think she could make a credible run for U.S. Senate.
Don't forget that when your name is tossed about as a potential candidate for higher office it makes it that much more likely that your name will be tossed about the next time a higher office opens up. And next time you might run.
Posted by: ColoBLT | March 22, 2005 at 01:45 PM
I had really come around on Hick for Governor until I was in a small group with him the other day. He said that if he was in the race, he would win.
That statement bothers me for a couple of reasons. First, just because you ran a good (maybe great) Mayor's race, doesn't mean you can win statewide. It's a whole other animal. Second, the statement is too cocky. Even if Hick feels that way, keep it to yourself. It will piss off insiders like me.
Posted by: Lurker | March 22, 2005 at 03:12 PM
I just read through the Washington Poast Article about McInnis. Sick. I saw McInnis as an elitest when I lived in Durango, but this kind of fund misuse is disgusting.
If McInnis does run for Gov, it will be the perfect time to get this story out in a big way.
Posted by: Strider | March 22, 2005 at 03:59 PM
Interesting Breaking news on 3rd CD. He's got support of Owens, Norton and McInnis:
http://www.cortezjournal.com/asp-bin/article_generation.asp?article_type=news&article_path=/news/05/news050322_4.htm
Posted by: cartman | March 22, 2005 at 04:05 PM
Where's the open thread?
That's better than lefty and righty.
You guys are hurting this site. Compare number of posts today versus pre-gimick days.
Posted by: Roger | March 22, 2005 at 04:19 PM
Too many Rogers all of a sudden. This is confusing, particularly as we may disagree. From now on, I am Roger D
Roger Dalkins
Posted by: Roger D | March 22, 2005 at 04:34 PM
Who cares what the Washington Post says we know where they lean. At least ask Scott McInnis about what really happened!! Scott will make a great Govenor!!!
Posted by: t christopher | March 25, 2005 at 10:50 AM
The story isn't an editorial. You can't deny campaign finance spending. It's in the report that he had to file, clear as day. Save your conspiracy theories. McInnis did this to himself.
Posted by: Ter Ducken | March 25, 2005 at 11:00 AM