CD-7 Republican Candidate Rick O’Donnell is the first among the field to send out a fundraising letter.
In a letter that hits tomorrow, O’Donnell announces that, indeed, Bobby B will not be seeking reelection in the District: “Congressman Bob Beauprez recently told me he will not be running for re-election… but instead plans to run for Governor.” (That’s gotta be HUGE news to Mark Paschall.)
While this certainly gives Rick the upper hand in terms of fundraising and reestablishing his credibility early in the race, it just may fizzle.
Yes, Rick’s attempt to distance himself ahead in the field may gain him some immediate traction with endorsements and earned media, but as we saw in the early Governors Line – folks have a tendency to know when there is a 3 ton gorilla hunkered down in a corner.
And in this case, it just might be Mike Coffman (that’s ironic for so many reasons.)
Though the State Treasurer has been seen sulking around the Capitol and Metro Region for the past week, he very well has the potential to be the biggest – if not only – threat to Rick.
O’Donnell will undoubtedly bring some of his former volunteers to the fight – along with high ranking endorsements from Bill Owens, Bruce Benson and perhaps even Bobby B., but Mike might just be the guy to beat all that.
Because if Mike can successfully roll even a portion of his contributions from the Gov race into a Congressional race – he’d easily have the ability to hire a top-notch campaign crew and even “import” some of his own most ardent supporters in the final push…
…making the 7th into exactly what the Governor’s Race was starting to look like: a struggle between the Activists and Donors of the Party.
RedHawk --
Your shilling for Mike Coffman is amazing, O'Donnell makes an announcement and all you talk about is Coffman! We all get it, your for Mike and Rick won't get a fair shake while you are doing the posting.
Let's not forget who the grassroots candidate was the back in 2002, it wasn't Beauprez, or Rogers or Zakhem, it was O'Donnell. What makes you think that Grassroots will leave him for Coffman???
I bet O'Donnell has raised more money in one week than Coffman did for his shortlived Governor's run.
Posted by: Jake | April 15, 2005 at 07:28 PM
unless he has segregated funds in his gubernatorial account, I don't think he can use any of them for the congressional.
I may not be correct about this, but I believe that funds that have been comingled in an account cannot be separated out based on the original donor's ability to legally contribute in a federal race. same reason federal funds cannot go to a state race now.
Also, don't forget that Paschall could be the spoiler in the 7th cd. and could even end up with the nomination depending on who stays in the race to the end.
Posted by: Roger D | April 15, 2005 at 10:26 PM
Redhawk, you make it clear this website is totally left leaning and wired in to the D's. Within minutes of Lamm and Polsfut announcing, you have their letters on your website. Where's O'Donnell's? Guess you have no inside line into his race or Republicans generally. Can you name one party leader who isn't already backing Rick -- from moderate Bruce Benson to conservative Bill Armstrong and everyone in between?
Yeah it takes more than money and endorsements to win, you don't think Rick doesn't know that? He had neither last time and top-lined BB and almost beat him in the primary. The grassroots were with Rick then and are with him even more now because when he lost he lost the right way and worked hard for BB. Rick's support isn't going to flake to Coffman.
Posted by: CD7Activist | April 16, 2005 at 08:53 AM
RedHawk is a guest poster, and other people were offered that opportunity. They don't censor guest posters at all.
If you read the Lamm post, the campaign manager talked to them before posting, likely giving them the press release at the same time. Maybe in ODonnell could try that and see if there is a response?
Posted by: peterco | April 16, 2005 at 03:32 PM
Did I miss something or did Ricky O jump on Bob Beauprez's plans to orchestrate his own announcement? Bad form and it won't earn him any points with Beauprez, would be my guess. Looks overly ambitious to boot.
Posted by: ralphcarr | April 16, 2005 at 08:31 PM
Ralphcarr --
From what I hear no one in Beauprez's camp is complaining.
Posted by: Jake | April 16, 2005 at 09:40 PM
I have a luxury here – you all know I’m a Republican (read my Bio), allowing me to REALLY be partisan on this “Trade Magazine of a Blog” we politico’s all read…
…am I heavy handed? Yes. I’m sure. But that’s why I always defer to Alva et al to keep me in line.
Posted by: RedHawk | April 17, 2005 at 11:22 PM
Everyone is talking about the endorsements and who has support of the party leadership. Here is the deal, the GOP is splintered and a lot of people in the GOP are not happy with party leadership and those in the establishment. In fact, I'll make the blunt statement that many in Beauprez district felt he sold out to become Bush's lap dog. And those are the Republicans saying that. I am not sure having a party endorsement in this race is gonna be a huge help. In many ways, it can hinder.
Posted by: irishstout | April 18, 2005 at 09:11 AM
Colorado Pols received the Rick O. letter before the letter was made public...yet it was never posted. Hmm...
Posted by: Baris | April 19, 2005 at 07:05 AM
We did get O'Donnell's letter, but Red Hawk received it soon after and posted it before we could do it ourselves. We post plenty from both sides - we posted the entire list of contributors from Marc Holtzman, for example. It just depends on the timing; sometimes we just can't do it immediately because we're not around to do it.
Posted by: Alva Adams | April 19, 2005 at 08:30 AM
irishstout - The DCCC called and said you can keep their 2004 talking points. They were an abysmal failure last year as Bob Beauprez's 12% victory demonstrated.
I suppose if Bob had many Republicans angry at him than he must have gained two-fold in Dem and Independent votes.
As a democrat, you will likely respond that the voters are stupid, blind, etc. What other logical defense could you have for your argument vs BB's results? Especially in a democrat year?
Posted by: Reality | April 19, 2005 at 08:41 AM
Irish Stout is clueless, the GOP is not splintered other than the back benchers who always complain but never do anything, the Democrat Party has the same group of whiners, if we could I bet both parties would pay for them to start thier own "Do Nothing" party. The GOP is fired up and focused, getting knocked down in 2004 will make the Colorado Republicans a better party in 2006, watch out!
Posted by: IRAsucks | April 19, 2005 at 08:47 AM
Alva - I don't see the letter posted on the site. Why not??
Posted by: Jake | April 19, 2005 at 04:12 PM
Why would a lefty site want to distribute a republican letter? I guess this site ain't Red for a reason!
Posted by: Settler | April 19, 2005 at 04:34 PM
Hey I am so sad that the Heaths and Lamms have not made peace -- they could form a group Lovable Limousine Liberal Losers -- Peggy Lamm has zero, none, zilch chances of winning a seat in Congress. Her ex sister-in-law cost us a chance to beat a vulnerable Nighthorse Campbell and Rollie Heath managed to go from six points behind in August to 30 points behind on election day -- Dems let us keep listening to these losers
Posted by: Vladimir | April 20, 2005 at 02:32 PM
IRA Sucks-
You refer the "do nothings" in the Republican Party - are you referring to the ones who have done NOTHING about illegal immigration and catered to the banking industry or the few strong conservatives who actually read and defend the Constitution?
Posted by: irishstout | April 20, 2005 at 03:43 PM